Differentiating ambiguity: an expository note
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
DIFFERENTIATING AMBIGUITY: An Expository Note1
Ghirardato, Maccheroni, and Marinacci (2004) propose a method for distinguishing between perceived ambiguity and the decision-makers reaction to it. They study a general class of preferences which they dub invariant biseparable. This class includes CEU and MEU. This note presents some examples which illustrate their results. Keywords, Ambiguity, multiple priors, invariant biseparable preferenc...
متن کاملLuxury Prices: an Expository Note*
Economists generally associate the redistribution of resources with the apparatus of taxes and transfer payments. Such redistributions are done by the power of the authorities. However, resources are redistributed by other means as well. People give away income in a variety of ways, deliberate and unintentional. In this paper, agents transfer consumption goods in return for a good which lacks m...
متن کاملDifferentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude
The objective of this paper is to show how ambiguity, and a decision maker (DM)’s response to it, can be modelled formally in the context of a general decision model. We introduce a relation derived from the DM’s preferences, called ‘‘unambiguous preference’’, and show that it can be represented by a set of probabilities. We provide such set with a simple differential characterization, and argu...
متن کاملAn Expository Note on the Existence of Moments of Fuller and HFUL Estimators∗
In a recent paper, Hausman et al. (2012) propose a new estimator, HFUL (Heteroscedasticity robust Fuller), for the linear model with endogeneity. This estimator is consistent and asymptotically normally distributed in the many instruments and many weak instruments asymptotics. Moreover, this estimator has moments, just like the estimator by Fuller (1977). The purpose of this note is to discuss ...
متن کاملA Game Theoretic Approach to the Pragmatics of Debate: An Expository Note
In this paper, the term ‘debate’ refers to a situation in which two parties disagree over some issue and each of them tries to persuade a third party, the listener, to adopt his position by raising arguments in his favor. We are interested in the logic behind the relative strength of the arguments and counterarguments; we therefore limit our discussion to debates in which one side is asked to a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Economic Theory
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0938-2259,1432-0479
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-007-0278-8